Best Practices for Scaling Analytics During Cloud Migration to AWS or Azure
Cloud migration has become a default move for most enterprises.
Yet many leaders discover—often too late—that moving infrastructure to the cloud does not automatically mean analytics will scale with it.
The symptoms are familiar: dashboards slow down during peak usage, cloud costs become unpredictable, and governance feels harder, not easier. This is not a tooling failure. It is a decision failure.
This article outlines what enterprise leaders should think about when scaling analytics during a cloud analytics migration—and how to frame decisions across AWS and Azure without getting lost in platforms or product details. It combines practical cloud migration best practices with leadership-level guidance to help avoid rework, cost overruns, and governance breakdowns.
Laying the Groundwork: Initial Steps for Cloud-Scale Analytics
Why analytics scaling is different from “just” cloud migration
Infrastructure migration is primarily a capacity and reliability problem.
Analytics scaling is a decision-making problem.
Analytics workloads behave differently from core transactional systems:
Demand is bursty, driven by reporting cycles, business reviews, and ad-hoc questions
Usage grows with new questions, not just more users
Performance expectations are visible and unforgiving leaders notice slow insights immediately
Costs are tied to how people query data, not just how much data exists
As a result, lifting analytics workloads into the cloud without rethinking how they scale often recreates on-prem problems—only with greater cost visibility and less tolerance for failure.
Schedule a 30-minute digital transformation strategy consultation
Explore more on Prioritizing Dashboard Rollouts: A Data-Driven Guide
What leaders must decide before scaling analytics in the cloud
Successful analytics scaling starts with clarity, not configuration. Before choosing services or architectures, leaders should align on a few non-negotiable decisions.
Define analytics objectives and workloads before migration
What does “scale” actually mean for your business?
Faster queries for executives?
More concurrent users?
Support for advanced analytics and AI?
Different answers lead to very different design trade-offs across AWS analytics scaling and Azure analytics scaling models.
Assess current data architecture and readiness
Data volumes and growth expectations
Query concurrency and latency tolerance
Data quality, ownership, and lineage gaps
Without this assessment, cloud data platform modernization tends to magnify existing weaknesses rather than fix them.
Clarify ownership of analytics performance and cost
In many organizations, infrastructure teams own the cloud bill while analytics teams drive usage. Without shared accountability, optimization rarely happens—regardless of platform.
Set intentional boundaries around flexibility and governance
Cloud platforms make experimentation easy. Unlimited freedom, however, often results in duplicated data, inconsistent metrics, and rising costs. Governance must scale alongside analytics usage, not trail behind it.
These are leadership decisions. They cannot be solved later by selecting the “right” service.
Read more Operational Intelligence: Top Dashboards for Execution, Efficiency, and Control
Comparing AWS and Azure for Analytics Scaling
At an enterprise level, AWS and Azure are both capable of supporting large-scale analytics. The more meaningful differences show up in how organizations align analytics with the rest of the business.
Design for cloud-native scaling on AWS and Azure
Ecosystem alignment
AWS often appeals to organizations with strong cloud-native engineering cultures and decentralized teams
Azure tends to integrate more tightly with Microsoft-centric enterprise environments and identity models
Neither is inherently better for analytics—but alignment reduces friction at scale.
For Microsoft-centric organizations, Microsoft Power BI consulting services play a critical role in enabling governed self-service analytics that align with Azure identity, security, and enterprise reporting standards.
Analytics service philosophy
AWS historically offers more granular, composable analytics services across data warehousing, big data, streaming, and BI
Azure often emphasizes more integrated analytics solutions spanning data lakes, warehouses, real-time analytics, and BI
This affects how quickly teams can move—and how complex environments become over time.
Anticipating and Overcoming Common Cloud Analytics Scaling Challenges
Across industries, the same issues appear repeatedly during analytics scaling efforts.
Plan explicitly for performance, reliability, and governance challenges
Performance bottlenecks
Platforms optimized for ingestion but not query concurrency
Poor separation between operational and analytical workloads
Underestimating the impact of self-service analytics at scale
Governance gaps
Metrics defined differently across teams
Limited data lineage and ownership clarity
Security controls applied inconsistently across environments
These challenges are rarely caused by platform limitations. They emerge when analytics grows faster than operating discipline.
Learn more The CIO’s View: Top IT Dashboards Driving Reliability, Security, and Value
Managing Cost While You Scale: AWS vs Azure Analytics Economics
Both AWS and Azure rely on consumption-based pricing for analytics services. Cost predictability depends less on the cloud provider and more on how analytics workloads are designed and governed.
Implement cost-aware architecture and operating patterns
Costs are driven by query behavior, not just data volume
Scaling compute for peak usage without managing idle capacity leads to overruns
Duplicate pipelines and redundant datasets quietly compound spend
Cloud analytics cost optimization is a management capability, not a cloud feature. Enterprises that lack usage guardrails experience cost surprises regardless of whether they choose AWS or Azure.
In practice, many enterprises rely on Snowflake consultants to design cost-aware architectures that separate compute from storage while maintaining predictable analytics performance at scale.
Standards and Frameworks to Guide Cloud Analytics Scaling
As analytics environments grow, informal practices break down.
Use migration tooling, landing zones, and reference frameworks
AWS Migration Hub and Azure Migration Center help structure discovery, assessment, and migration tracking
Cloud provider reference architectures support scalable analytics platforms and data lakes
Common patterns include decoupled storage and compute, ELT pipelines, serverless processing, autoscaling, and landing zones
Governance frameworks inspired by DAMA-style principles help standardize ownership, lineage, and quality
Security and compliance standards such as ISO 27001 and SOC 2 inform analytics governance in regulated environments
Frameworks reduce risk by turning one-off decisions into repeatable patterns.
Pulling It Together: A Practical Checklist for Your Migration Plan
High-performing analytics organizations share a few consistent principles, regardless of cloud choice.
Create a phased rollout and optimization checklist
Define what “scale” means for your analytics use cases
Assess data architecture readiness before migration
Choose cloud-native scaling patterns aligned to your operating model
Establish governance, security, and access controls by design
Implement cost transparency and FinOps practices
Apply standards and reference architectures consistently
Review usage, performance, and cost as business needs evolve
The Leadership Takeaway
Scaling analytics in the cloud is not a tooling exercise. It is a strategic decision about how insight, cost, and control evolve together.
AWS and Azure both provide powerful analytics capabilities. What determines success is whether leaders treat analytics scaling as a first-class business problem—or an afterthought of infrastructure migration.
For teams navigating this journey, a useful next step is to pressure-test analytics maturity across ownership, cost transparency, governance readiness, and alignment with business decision-making. Those questions tend to surface the real work that matters—long before platform choices do.
Talk to our Digital Transformation Experts – Schedule a 30-min Consultation